Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 05:14
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Russia can stop this any time.
What’s next?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What makes someone feel "rich enough" in different societies?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
How do I promote my book to get it reviewed and grow an audience if I already published it?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Kate Middleton Glows in First Trooping the Colour After Cancer Remission - instyle.com
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Everything Apple Announced at WWDC 2025 - WIRED
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Used vehicle prices ease from tariff fear-buying highs but remain elevated - CNBC
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Thank you.
Staying Positive Could Protect Against Middle-Aged Memory Loss, 16-Year Study Reveals - SciTechDaily
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?